Which statement is true about extrasensory perception (ESP)?

The statement that there is no reliable scientific evidence for ESP is accurate because rigorous scientific studies have not provided consistent or replicable evidence supporting the existence of extrasensory perception. Research in psychology prioritizes empirical data and reproducibility, and although there are anecdotal accounts and some studies that claim to demonstrate ESP, these findings often fail to hold up under scrutiny or lack replicability in controlled environments. This absence of strong scientific backing emphasizes the need for caution when interpreting claims of ESP, as they often stem from subjective experiences or anecdotal evidence rather than established scientific principles.

In contrast, the other options present misconceptions. ESP is not formally recognized as the "seventh sense" in psychology or biology, and belief in ESP varies widely among different populations, making it inaccurate to claim college seniors are more likely to believe in it universally. The notion that there is reliable evidence supporting all forms of ESP is also misleading because, across various studies, results have not consistently shown support for any specific type of ESP. This collective understanding aligns with critical thinking in psychology, emphasizing the distinction between belief and scientifically validated knowledge.